The Rochester Schools Home District Information Schools School Board People and Programs Employment Bids and Specifications Sitemap

Gonic School
Annual Progress Report - October 2006

Gonic School
Gonic School

Respect - Responsibility - Results

Annual Report to
School Board Instruction Committee
October 19, 2006

Representing our staff:

Pam Blanchard, Special Education Teacher
Barbara Brown, Fourth Grade Teacher
Nancy Ferguson, Kindergarten Teacher
Martha Wingate, Principal

NWEA MAP RIT Scores: READING                                     

SECOND GRADE READING % On Grade Level

Fall 2005

Spring 2006

Fall 2006

66%

69%

70%

THIRD GRADE READING % On Grade Level

Fall 2005

Spring 2006

Fall 2006

50%

58%

62%

FOURTH GRADE READING % On Grade Level

Fall 2005

Spring 2006

Fall 2006

51%

73%

58%

FIFTH GRADE READING % On Grade Level

Fall 2005

Spring 2006

Fall 2006

63%

74%

73%

Mrs. Norris’s GRADE FIVE
Mrs. Norris’s GRADE FIVE

NWEA MAP RIT Scores: MATH                                     

SECOND GRADE MATH % On Grade Level

Fall 2005

Spring 2006

Fall 2006

63%

77%

63%

THIRD GRADE MATH % On Grade Level

Fall 2005

Spring 2006

Fall 2006

68%

70%

67%

FOURTH GRADE MATH % On Grade Level

Fall 2005

Spring 2006

Fall 2006

63%

80%

59%

FIFTH GRADE MATH % On Grade Level

Fall 2005

Spring 2006

Fall 2006

61%

79%

69%

Mrs. Norris’s GRADE FIVE
Mrs. Norris’s GRADE FIVE

Activities Based on Last Year’s Results, and Their Relative Success:

  • Tutoring: individual, two and three student groups: successful for students with regular participation, based on class work and assessments; several students did not attend because of lack of transportation or interest
  • Tier II: concentrated work in a small group with a variety of materials; instruction provided by classroom teacher, specialist or paraprofessional; most successful when instruction was daily and with the same person
  • Accelerated Reader incentives: PTA provided many opportunities for students to participate in reading during vacations; incentives included certificates, pencils, balls, special privileges and limousine rides to McDonald’s for lunch, and recognition in our newsletter and at assemblies. This incentive program appealed to a number of students, although participation was always higher during vacations than during the summer
  • Kindergarten Tutoring: mixed success; some students were tired even after their half day in school; others showed improvement in class and assessments (DIBELS). Progress monitoring needed to be more formalized
  • Homework Club: provided two times per week for students to do their homework; primarily a babysitting tool
  • Enrichment Groups: while some students worked on Fundations, a Tier II program, others were able to work on enrichment activities in reading; positive results in testing, self-esteem (every student eventually participated in an enrichment activity to ensure all had this special time)
  • Summer Tutoring: moved from summer school to individual/small group tutoring. Student and parent feedback was very positive about this program; students’ showed more positive attitude toward learning; one student had his writing published online
  • Child Study Team: worked to change the format of our CST to a data-based committee; team members became more skilled working with data and creating options
  • Math Club: positive experience for students; many arrived at school early in the morning to participate
  • NWEA MAP Goal Sheets: used our own form; discussed with students before conferences, making the meeting with parents more valuable; several students participated in their conferences; teachers met quarterly with students to review goals and sent home reminders regarding preparation for testing. Activity was most successful when students set their own goals; students enjoyed competing against their own scores
  • Reading pilots: improvement noted in language scores last spring and this fal
Mrs. Lindsay’s GRADE TWO
Mrs. Lindsay’s GRADE TWO

2006 – 2007 Plans Based on Fall RIT Scores and Last Year’s Activities

  • Student-led conferences including goal sheets from NWEA’s Dynamic Suite (sent home for the first time with Interim Reports on October 6; second form to be used at November parent-teacher conferences
  • Response to Intervention: as our Data Team tweaks it’s goals, we will be more aggressive in providing intervention where and when it is needed
  • Tutoring; extended day kindergarten: we continue to make this a priority; the program will run better with a facilitator overseeing it. Progress monitoring will be checked every 4-6 weeks
  • Individual Student Data Sheet: created by Sally Riley and Jackie Falhaber, this form will be fully implemented this year to help us keep better track of student progress
  • Math and Reading Clubs: we will continue with our math club and plan to start a reading club with games and activities (both to replace the Homework Club)
  • Concentrate tutoring on Tuesdays and Thursdays; especially if we are able to get transportation for students at the end of the sessions.
  • Eagle news: more information for parents highlighting one reading/math activity per week to do at home
  • Parent workshops: at school, at a local restaurant (Brickstones), at parents’ homes; to demonstrate reading activities to parents
  • Student participation in workshops and PTA meetings: wonderful opportunity for students to show parents games, reading activities, etc. (and parents will attend PTA if their students are involved)
  • Parent contact: each teacher will contact parents about student goals and progress – noting both areas that will need practice and positive performances on MAP testing
  • Book Report/Accelerated Reader Program: Now to include a variety of book report formats. We will use our Gonic Magazine to spotlight student work
  • Target skills in read aloud in content area as well as reading
  • PEGs: Teachers are excited to focus on improving our reading instruction. Ideas include staff reading Whatever It Takes by Richard DuFour and applying practices; summarizing GLE’s and state standards in an easy-to-read brochure format at each grade level
  • Plans to group for needs beyond grade level (using RIT ranges)
  • Incentives for making individual and group goals
  • No TV week program
  • Meet with Sally Riley to have “another set of eyes” review our scheduling challenges

 

Mrs. Amorim’s GRADE TWO

Mrs. Amorim’s GRADE TWO

Reallocation of Resources/Request for Additional Resources

  • Make ˝ time reading specialist position full time
  • Assistant Principal, ˝ time: could be paired with ˝ time special education teacher who would coordinate services and be primary case manager
  • Additional specialists (PE, Art, Music) to facilitate scheduling
  • Addition of self-contained special education program for 4th and 5th graders
  • Duty-free lunch/recess period: teachers would work with small groups for 15 minutes
  • Late bus so that students could stay after school for reading and math activities
  • Two additional paraprofessional for special education programs
  • One paraprofessional per class (or per grade)
  • Supplemental books and materials for reading program
Mrs. Gagnon’s GRADE FOUR
Mrs. Gagnon’s GRADE FOUR
The Rochester Schools
150 Wakefield Street Suite #8
Rochester, NH 03867
(603) 332-3678 (VOICE) (603) 335-7367 (FAX)
Home || Our District || General Information || Our Schools || School Board || Employment
Parent Resources || Bids and Specifications || Site Map